Lucas Vicente
Marco Kohns

The Revokio team

We’re Lucas Vicente and Marco Kohns. We combine software growth engineering, technical SEO, growth product, and applied AI research in one focused Google manual penalty recovery practice.

Engineering and technical SEO Product systems, acquisition loops, and manual action diagnosis.
Growth product and applied AI Founder, research, scaling, and publishing-system experience.
Evidence-led remediation Cleanup strategy, governance, and reconsideration support.

Two operators, one recovery practice

Lucas Vicente

Senior Software Growth Engineer

Lucas works where SEO, product, engineering, and growth meet. He has been through a Google manual penalty firsthand and previously helped resolve one for a Series B marketplace backed by leading VC firms, including a16z.

How we keep the work trustworthy

We do not guarantee outcomes

Google makes the final decision on manual actions and ranking restoration.

We separate diagnosis from cleanup

A confirmed manual action needs policy remediation. An algorithmic drop needs a different investigation.

We avoid fake proof

Case details are kept factual and discreet; confidential work stays confidential.

We document the system change

A reconsideration request should show what changed, not just promise future cleanup.

Manual action guides by the Revokio team

Each guide is written from the same operating premise: identify the specific policy issue, clean up the system that produced it, and make the evidence easy to review.

Manual action vs algorithmic penalty A diagnostic guide for separating a Search Console manual action from a broader ranking or traffic decline. How to check for a Google manual action A Search Console walkthrough for finding the Manual Actions report and interpreting the notice without overreacting. Google reconsideration request guide A practical guide to preparing a reconsideration request after remediation, with emphasis on evidence and restraint. Unnatural links manual action A guide to link-related manual actions, risky patterns, cleanup decisions, disavow judgment, and documentation. Thin content manual action A guide to classifying thin, duplicate, scraped, doorway, and low-value URL patterns before remediation. Site reputation abuse manual action A guide to third-party content, hosted partner sections, coupon or review surfaces, and governance controls. Can comment spam cause a manual action? Find the publishing routes behind forum, profile, and comment spam, then build a cleanup record that covers the whole pattern. How do we fix an outbound-link manual action? Audit paid placements, affiliate links, and publishing templates without confusing outbound cleanup with backlink disavow. Why does a page redirect only some visitors? Build a request comparison to diagnose cloaking, conditional redirects, and differences between browser and crawler output. Can AI-assisted pages cause a manual action? Review the purpose, source material, and added value of a publishing system before choosing what to improve, consolidate, or retire. Does a schema manual action affect rankings? Separate rich-result eligibility from ordinary rankings, then compare structured claims with the visible page and fix the template. Hidden text and keyword stuffing Find manipulative text without removing useful accordions, accessible labels, or legitimate product information. When reconsideration is rejected Reopen the diagnosis, identify what changed since the last submission, and assemble evidence for a justified resubmission. Manual action or security issue? Separate policy enforcement from a hacked or harmful site, and route the cleanup to the correct Search Console review. Partial versus sitewide action Turn the affected scope into a defensible audit inventory, without mistaking sample URLs for a complete cleanup list. Revoked, but rankings have not returned Separate confirmed clearance from crawling, indexing, and ranking, then investigate what the remaining pages can earn.